Senator A. Rehman Malik befitting response to US President Donald Trump


November 9, 2018
PRESS STATEMENT
SENATOR A. REHMAN MALIK CONDEMNED INDIAN AGGRESSION ACROSS LOC, EXPRESSED GRAVE CONCERNS OVER PRICE HIKE, ASKED GOVERNMENT TO DEVICE A MECHANISM TO CONTROL PRICE.
Senator A. Rehman Malik lauded the efforts of Chairman Senate, Secretary Senate and Senate staff for hosting Asian Parliament Assembly in Gwadar Balochistan. He said by hosting representatives of 26 countries, message of peaceful and progressive Balochistan was conveyed to the rest of the world.
While speaking during matters of public importance, Senator A. Rehman Malik expressed grave concerns over unannounced hike in price and sought reply from the government as how the prices are being controlled. He said that the entire country has a dire need of setting up mechanism and a specific system to control the prices. He said unfortunately manufacturers, vendors and distributors fix the prices according to own will after every hike in petroleum price and fall of Pakistani rupee. He said there is no check and balance on the increase of the price and this failure on the part of the provincial and federal government needs to be rectified. He asked the government to bring an enactment to make a national price regulator act as law by Price Regulatory Commission (PRC) to ensure price control.  He insisted that unfortunately we could not draw any mechanism or formula for price control when currency value declines and petrol price increases.
He said “the government must inform the house whether any such mechanism is followed to fix the prices of petrol as far as I know before the 18th Amendment magistrate used to set the criteria for evaluating the prices”. He said that when government increases the petrol price it leads to increase in inflation across the country.
Senator A. Rehman Malik strongly condemned the unprovoked fire across the Line of Control (LoC) by Indian Forces. He asked the government of Pakistan to go in United Nations against Indian brutalities against poor Kashmiris and unprovoked fire across the Line of Control (LoC).
Senator A. Rehman Malik said that he has demanded to discuss the letter Prime Minister Imran Khan had written to India Prime Minister Narendra Modi. He added that he is astonished how the letter which circulated across the world and published in every paper cannot be discussed in this august house of Parliament. 

Pak cyber security and cyber crime by Senator A. Rehman Malik




The present era has now become dependent of IT based facilities. It is an amazing fast and continuous development in multidimensional communication both in audio and video. The international community has become highly dependent of this new technology but at the same time the criminals have also invented the faster technique of hacking to commit crimes.
Pak nation witnessed the most recent Cyber-attack on the banking data where many have been deprived of millions of rupees by online transfer of money from one account to the other. In addition to it, the fast growing use of “apps” has totally changed the way of life and it is taking over almost everything one does. An app is a software that can be executed as you can download it or have direct access to it by using your mobile phone or any other internet device. The first ever app was created by Apple App Store launched in July 2008, a year after the first iPhone was released as it launched 500 apps after its release.
The IT business progressed rapidly as the software development has produced countless millionaires. Bill Gate happened to be the pioneer of the IT industry. The Silicon Valley is a main trading and promoting hub of Cyber industries. The growing IT and Cyber industries have brought a revolution in the field of electronics, which is becoming the integral part of almost every growing industry.
The word cyber means “virtual Reality”. It technically is a connection with electronic communication networks, especially the internet mother of media connectivity. The cyber technology revolves around the internet technology involving the flow of information in cellular phones, computers and video game consoles etc. The internet has taken our world by storm as it plays a huge role in our lives today. Even the car we drive or TV we watch today is a part of cyber technology because they have access to internet.
The revolution and advancement of cyber-technology have both positive and negative effects on our daily lives. We are able to get information at our fingertips through cyber technology. These elements of Cyber technology revolution may seem to be as exceedingly amazing but they also bring about certain problems such as cyber-bullying, identity theft and loss of private data etc. All of these threats are known as Cyber-attack, Cyber-crime or Cyber-theft in the internet world and all of us are familiar with the terms.
Cybercrime is a crime done over the web using a computer, or a networked device. Any crime committed using a computer or automated system including Identity theft, harassing, phishing, impersonating or maligning someone on social network sites, stealing money from accounts online, hacking into someone’s computer, ATM or mobile data, developing fake websites, posting someone’s personal content or data without their permission in order to harm their reputation or relationships and ransom etc. are some of the many examples of cyber-crimes.
Cyber security wall is a virtual wall created to protect information on main gateways of telecom hardware, computer, networks, programmes, content and data from unauthorised access, cyber-attacks or threats that are aimed for exploitation or theft. Cyber security covers four major areas of involving Cyber-crime; Application Security, Information security, Disaster security and Network security etc.
There are several hacking tools and softwares that are designed to assist with hacking for hacking purposes. For example: Nmap, Nessus, John the Ripper, p0f, Winzapper, mSpy, Bribes, ActiveX and iKeyMonitor etc.
Apparently, there has not yet been any foolproof security tool designed to keep your networks and computers safe from cyber-attacks but there are different measures we can take to keep our online life safe and secure i.e. By turning on firewall feature of your router. Use a good anti-virus software. Shop only from secure online websites. Keep your credit cards and bank account details to yourself as the major scams are on stolen data.
You need to set up strong passwords on your social accounts. Turn on spam blockers and keep your information secure by encrypting your data.
Following are 5 of the biggest and most significant international cyber-crimes and data breaches of all times that pose threat to our business, privacy and governments.
In 2000, a 15 year old guy, Micheal Calce caused a mischief in Cyberspace. He was a high-school student in Canada when he carried out a cyber-attack on number of high profile commercial websites including CNN, Amazon, eBay and Yahoo, which resulted in $1.2 billion damage. For being underage, he was sentenced to only eight months of open custody and his online access also got limited by the court.
The most infamous than famous cyber-crime is the tragic case of Aaron Schwartz, the brilliant and young American Internet hacktivist who was arrested in 2011 for unlawfully downloading and publishing academic journals at MIT. He was wildly overcharged by federal prosecutors and 35 years of imprisonment resulting in his suicide in 2013.
Another most widespread cyber-attack ever hit the NHS computer systems in mid-2017. The hackers managed to gain access to the UK's medical system. The virus named “WannaCry” was spread through email in the form of attachments as once a user clicked on it, all files would be locked spreading the virus through computers and demanding money in order to gain access again. Around 300,000 computers were infected by “WannaCry” and the NHS remained down for a number of days, when a 22 year old security researcher from Devon managed to find the kill switch and regained access to the system.
In 2015, for a period of two years around 650 million euros were stolen from banks around the world when Russian based hackers used malware to infiltrate banks' computer systems and gathered personal data. They successfully impersonated online bank staff to authorise fraudulent transfers, and also dispensed cash from ATM machines without a bank card.
In 2014, famous entertainment company Sony Pictures were hit with a crippling virus by Cyber-crime group Guardians of Peace (GOP) in a blackmail attempt. Around 100 terabytes of sensitive data got stolen in the attack. It was alleged that the attack was carried out after North Korea's disapproval of the film 'The Interview'.
The film characterised the President Kim Jong-un and contained a plot where main characters plotted to assassinate him. The case was investigated by US agencies, which claimed that North Korea had authorised the cyber-attack in order to prevent the film from releasing.
In 2017 January, a number of UK high street banks, including Lloyds Bank faced a denial-of-service (DoS) attack by the hackers. During the attack, more than 20 million UK accounts were blocked and as a result, customers were unable to send payments or check their balance online.
Incidents of cyber-hacking on Govt’s data:
China is known to be the home to cyber spies and hackers, which more than any other country in the world has stolen more secrets from businesses and governments. The primary cyber-aggression of China has always been towards the US making it a serious threat of espionage to US, Russia, Iran and North Korea.
The first operation that Chinese hackers conducted against the US was in 1999 during the Kosovo conflict, when the US bombed the Chinese embassy in Belgrade accidentally killing three Chinese reporters. In retaliation, the patriotic hackers planted messages denouncing “Nato’s brutal action” on a number of US government websites.
Despite India’s reputation for being an IT and software powerhouse, around 13,301 cyber security breaches were reported in 2011. The biggest cyber-attack that the country had faced took place on July 12, 2012 in which hackers broke into the email accounts of 12,000 people including high officials from Defence Research and Development Organisation (DRDO), the Indo-Tibetan Border Police (ITBP), Ministry of Home Affairs, and the Ministry of External Affairs.
On June 2010, Iran’s nuclear facility in Natanz was infected by Stuxnet, a cyber worm, as it was subjected to cyber-attack. However, it was believed that it was a combined effort of Israel and the United States but no one claimed responsibility for it. The worm had destroyed Tehran’s 1000 nuclear centrifuges and set the country’s atomic ability back to at least two years.

The virus infected over 60,000 computers as it was spread beyond the plant.
On March 7, WikiLeaks published a data cache, which contained 8,761 documents that have been allegedly stolen from the CIA. The documents involved alleged spying operations and hacking tools. Revelations included bugs in Windows, iOS and Android vulnerabilities, and the ability to turn some smart TVs into listening devices.
Some hackers consistently keep forcing their entry into any Cyber/IT based hardware by cloning it or breaking the password. The incidents in the past show that most of the professional hackers have been produced by India both at private and official level. Second most expert hackers are from Russia.
The most recent indicators and incidents show that Israel is now taking the lead in hacking and spying. We are at present extending Cyber dependence but without proper counter measures against the Cyber-attack.
In recent past our country has faced various cyber breaches on individual as well as on state level and we do not yet have an efficient countering measure. The major attack of the year began in mid-October with Bank Islami, now it has taken a rapid pace across the whole country. Individuals continue to lose money from their bank accounts of different banks and the major cause for concern is that banks are hiding the information about these cyber robberies. A total of 19,864 cards of 22 Pakistan banks have been compromised in this attack till now. People have also been receiving scam calls by hackers impersonating bank staff to make reveal their bank account details.
Unfortunately, there is no law on Cyber security, which needs to be brought in to safeguard the firewalls of our organisations which are prone to cyber-attacks. Ironically, the first ever Cyber Crime bill that was passed on August 11, 2016 by Pakistan’s lower house, the National Assembly, as the Prevention of Electronic Crimes Act, 2016, is controversial in its terms. The law has worried human rights and pro-democracy activists through its over broad language against the freedom of speech.
The law also allows the authorised officers to have access to anyone’s computer and personal data whenever they want during investigation. It also gives unlimited authorities to the PTA to decide as to what is legal or illegal.
The law has provided 7 years of imprisonment sentence to those planning, recruiting or funding terrorism or propaganda online against the state. Hence, the sections of the Bill prove that the law only gives unfair prosecutions to the handlers of the state as no provisions have been set up to protect the privacy and sensitive data of the individuals.
Hence, the above discussions entail that all the above networks and data systems are unsecured unless they are secured through foolproof security.
There is no law in Pakistan against those who break the security firewalls to steal the import data including the bank record. It is theft and its trial needs substantial digital evidence including attempt to enter in the database. It is, therefore, need of the time that Parliament bring new law only on Cyber security for the protection of national and private data including the bank database.
Although we do have a Cyber Act but we may bring a separate act on Cyber security or add another Cyber security chapter relating to proper Cyber security in the act to cope with the issues. Pakistan definitely needs an effective “National Cyber Security Act “to protect its people from local and alien Cyber hackers.
The article was published by The News on November 19, 2018 and the link to the original article is: https://www.thenews.com.pk/print/395551-pak-cyber-security-and-cyber-crime

Vision of Iqbal for Pakistan by Senator A. Rehman Malik



I feel lucky to have done my B.Sc. from the same college where our great poet and Mohsin-e-Pakistan Allama Muhammad Iqbal had studied. I also had the chance to hear about his quick and witty responses from the teachers and professors of the college while studying.
My English Professor Dr. Khair Ullah once narrated that; one day Allama Iqbal arrived late in the class and the teacher asked him “ Iqbal why are you late”? To which he responded: “Sir Iqbal hamesha late hi ata hai”.
I once went to Spain and there I visited the famous Mosque of Cordoba (Masjid E Qurtuba), which was converted to a Cathedral after the fall of Muslims in Spain in around 1246. The beauty of the place is splendid and is mentioned by Iqbal in his poetry as I was told by the priest of the Cathedral upon my visit. This eight-stanza Urdu poem by Iqbal was written in 1932 and published in his Bāl-e Jibrīl collection. It is regarded as “one of his most famous pieces” and a “masterpiece”. In the poem, he has resembled the beauty of pillars of the mosque with the line of trees in Syrian Desert.“Your foundations are lasting, your columns countlessLike a cluster of palms in the desert of Syria”I had similar experience at Tashkent where I found many fans of Iqbal and a singer sung his verses making us feel proud.
Since I was born in Sialkot and was brought up there, one of my class fellows used to live where Iqbal’s ancestral house was located near Mohalla Imam Sahib. I used to get a chance to see the house every now and then. The last time I had visited the place, I ordered the repair of the house through the local PWD.
My father used to narrate very interesting things about Iqbal like; he used to love travelling in a Tanga and was friendly with locals. He preferred to wear white shirt and Tehmad at home. He had very simple living as the house was small connected with other houses of the locality.
Although he led a very simple life yet he used to dream big for Muslims of the Sub–Continent. His intellect was as great and big as the meaning of his name was. He was the first to have suggested the idea of creation of separate country for the Muslims of India.
The Muslims world has not produced any thinker of Iqbal’s stature. He was a lawyer, philosopher, poet, politician and in short, the dreamer of Pakistan. He gave the idea of a separate homeland for Muslims in North-West of India in his presidential address of All India Muslim League annual meeting held at Allahabad in 1930, where they can practice their religion and live freely.
If we say that he was the conceptual founder of Pakistan it wouldn’t be wrong. He not only proposed a homeland for the Muslims of Sub-continent but also tried to wake up the whole Muslim Ummah through his visionary and philosophical ideas depicted in his poetry.
He represented his own interpretation of Islam, which is not only representation of true spirit of Islam but also at the same time synchronized with the modern age.
One of the basic ideas of Iqbal is “self-actualisation”, which means to know about the purpose of your existence in this world. He also complements this idea with the answer of this question. He says: “Truly purpose of the every Muslim’s life is to please the Allah Almighty”. Now, the way he pleases may differ for everyone.
His poetry was full of motivation that one of the Indonesian politicians says: “We lead our freedom movement through the poetry of Iqbal”.
Allama Muhammad Iqbal devoted his life to make Muslims rise above sectarian divides as he writes about it in the Jawab-e-Shikwa poem in which there is “answer to the complaint”, God addresses him with a reply to some of his own lamentations in a previous and related poem, “Shikwa”. So as such, he was ideologically above sectarian divides and sought to bring all Muslims under the banner of the Prophet (PBUH) and the earliest Companions.
He kept stressing on the spiritual and moral emptiness of Western culture and introduced a term of “Momin” - a true Muslim follower of Islam in both faith as well as practice. He compared a non-Muslim with a Muslim as under: “A non-Muslims identity is that he always runs for universe while a Muslim identification is that the whole universes run towards him”
Unfortunately we as Sub-continent Muslims have failed to pursue his vision for Muslims and despite having a separate State for our religious livelihood, no Islam is implemented in it and we have destroyed Allama Iqbal’s dream. We run after lust, wealth and worldly matters. We never try to implement his idea of unity. We assume about ourselves as a nation who leads the Muslim world but we have failed to create unity among us. We have not been able to lead Muslim Ummah.
While Allama Iqbal was processing thought of a separate country he had thought of a separate country for Muslim, which would become a great Islamic State to lead the Muslim Ummah.


The Article was published by "The Nation" on November 9, 2018 and the link to the article : Vision of Iqbal for Pakistan by Senator A. Rehman Malik



Saudi-Yemen mediation or Pak military support by Senator A. Rehman Malik





It was mid-2004 when I landed in Aden in connection with signing of an oil contract for our oil company with Aden refinery.
I met the CEO of the company over there that probably looked like an Indian and after the meeting he confirmed me that his forefathers like many Indians came here and settled here. Later on, he took me to the town near the port which looked like as if I was in Layari or Chakiwara. I found the Indo-Pak culture there.
My host added to my knowledge that the most of the oil concessions in Yemen are done in their tribal areas under Houthi control. These are the same tribes which are now fighting against the Government and Saudi Arabia

The tribal culture on the mountains of Yemen along the Saudi border looked to be the same as of FATA in our country. I saw it during my visit that even the children had guns in their hands in tribal areas of Yemen the way I used to see children with weapons in FATA as director FIA for more than three years. They have almost the same eating habits and their favourite food is meat like ours. Interestingly I found everyone in the evening enjoyed their bite of “ghat- green leaves “like our most of the Tribesmen enjoy the bite of “Naswar.

I am privy to the fact that the operation going on in FATA forced the Afro-Arab terrorists to move towards Yemen which were duly supported by CIA.
In ancient times, Yemen was known as Arabia Felix, Latin for “happy” or “fortunate”. Today, Yemen is neither happy nor fortunate but it acquired the name because its high mountains attracted rain, making it more fertile than most of the Arabian Peninsula. The history of the Yemen stretches back over 3,000 years. From about 1000 BC this region of the Southern Arabian Peninsula was ruled by three successive civilisations -- Minean, Sabaean (Shabean) and Himyarite.
Yemen is claimed to be the ancient homeland of the Queen of Sheba (Balqis or Bilqis in Arabic). Her dealings with Hazrat Suleman are mentioned in the Bible and the Qur’an. The Story of him converting the Queen to Islam by influencing her through his deeds of morality by not accepting bribe and being strict when it came to shirk and kufr, is mentioned in Surah An-Naml of Quran. He later married her and let her rule Yemen.
This historically rich country Yemen has people mainly of Arab origin, many of which is Saudi nationals and is still a largely tribal society. In the northern, mountainous parts of the country, there are some 400 Zaidi tribes.
Even Osama bin Laden’s family lived in Wadi Doan in southern Yemen before immigrating to Saudi Arabia. In the early 1990s, Muslim volunteers who had fought against Soviet troops in Afghanistan moved to Yemen and the country has had a jihadist presence ever since.
There was a time when Yemen and Saudi Arabia used to have close ties. It was the West, which didn’t like the idea of friendly ties between them so it decided to destabilise Middle East especially through Yemen.

The relationship between Saudi Arabia and Yemen became tense when Abdullah Hassan al-Asiri; a member of al-Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula attempted to assassinate Saudi Arabia’s Deputy Minister of the Interior, Muhammad bin Nayef in 2009, in a suicide bombing. The attempt however had failed as the prince was only slightly injured but the bomber had died on the spot. The attack became the initial cause of wedge between the two countries as this was the first assassination attempt against a royal family member since 2003.

Yemen was ruled for a millennium by Zaydi Shia imams until 1962, and the Houthis were founded as a Zaydi Shia revivalist movement. However, the Houthis have not called for restoring the imamate. Rather; their demands have been primarily economic and political in nature. Houthi rebels are always seeking to over throw the Government as they did before as well by executing their former President. They are willing to retain control of Yemen as they do not want a Sunni to be the head of the State. Currently a Civil war is going on in Yemen between the Government and Houthis have now control much of northern Yemen, having taken over the capital Sanaa in September 2014 and pushed the Hadi government into exile in November 2015.They want total control over the Yemen as the globally-important Gulf of Aden and the Suez Canal of Yemen sits on the narrow Bab el-Mandeb strait through which much of the world’s oil shipments pass. This is why in 2015; Saudi Arabia formed a coalition of Arab states to defeat the Houthis in Yemen. The coalition now includes Qatar, Kuwait, the United Arab Emirates, Bahrain, Egypt, Morocco, Jordan, Sudan and Senegal. Several of these countries have sent troops to fight on the ground in Yemen.
This tug of war is still continued between Saudi and Yemen where Iran has become a party. The tension has been growing rapidly and it clearly has become the replica of Afghan vs. Taliban war like the situation in FATA.
Saudi Arabia suspects that Iran is funding this Houthi movement and training these subversive activists to take control of the long, porous border which it shares with Yemen. Due to this on-going war, from March 2015 to December 2017, 8,670–13,600 people have been killed in Yemen, including more than 5,200 civilians, as well as estimates of more than 50,000 dead as a result of an ongoing famine due to the war.
Saudi Arabia has been dragged with an agenda in this Yemen War whereas Iran is also tricked into it by using religious card. USA has also jumped in the war leaving un-finished agenda in Syria to protect its own economic agenda to have his share in oil and defense sale but also simultaneously oblige Israel as Iran continues to threat Israel.
It has been decided by the leadership of Middle East including Saudi Arabia to rehabilitate the displaced persons and reconstruction of Yemen.
The Saudi backed President Abdullah Saleh was killed by Houthis and now only a city in the radius of 32 kilometer is under the control of the Yemeni Government, whereas the rest of the country is with the rebels.
The reconstruction by a non-Muslim force is not being accepted by the rebels. According to inside reports the rebels may agree to have Pak Army to play its role in construction and rehabilitation of the country.
I think it is right to say that Saudi Arabia at present does not need Pak political or diplomatic support but rather it has dire need of our unmatched abilities of Pakistan Army which was earlier declined because of our internal unrest caused by terrorism.

I think this is high time that Pakistan should fully support Saudi Arabia to counter their internal and external threats. We should help our Saudi brothers unconditionally without anything in return.

Middle East looks to be in continued troubles because of Daesh and other pressing internal & external developments after the murder of a Saudi Journalist Jamal Khashoggi. The international pressure may increase more in coming weeks and is likely to add to the problems of Saudi Arabia. If USA withdraws its forces from Saudi Arabia, it will create huge unbalance of power in the region. In this emerging crisis situation, only Pakistan can help in countering these internal and external pressures and in the meantime Pakistan should play its role to bring Iran & Saudi on the table to sort out their issues respectively. Pakistan must take the leadership of UAE into confidence as one of the major player and supporter of global peace.

In other words, Mr Prime Minister, I suppose that it is not mediation which is required between Saudi Arabia & Yemen but the military and political support of Pakistan to Saudi Arabia is needed to resolve and to protect their interests. Moreover, it is our duty to protect our holy places at any cost making it an opportunity for Pakistan to create peace and harmony in Middle East. Pakistan can also make Iran realize about the devastating effects of armed conflict between Iran and Middle East as this is what I wanted President Nijad and the then Supreme leader of Iran to understand when I acted as mediator.

I propose a debate on camera over this issue and if Pakistan receives any such offer, let there be support for our Saudi brothers. Let us not sell this support rather lend it as a token of friendship towards Saudis the way they supported us in the past in our difficult times.
The above views are personal and do not necessarily represent my party’s policy.
The Article has been Published in ‘’The Nation’’ on November 8th, 2018





NRO – Anti-PPP propaganda and reality: an eyewitness account by Senator A. Rehman Malik


There are lot of controversies created in the media on an imaginary NRO supposedly signed between Shaheed Mohtarma Benazir Bhutto and General Pervez Musharraf for allegedly aiming at dropping all the case against PPP leadership. I would like to categorically deny this perception by challenging everyone who has been claiming that an NRO was signed between Shaheed Benazir Bhutto and General Pervez Musharraf. I expect someone either to accept my challenge or stop criticising against PPP leadership.


I feel that it is my national duty to put the facts straight related to series of meetings with General Pervez Musharraf and his team where I was leading on behalf of Mohtarma Benazir Bhutto in London and Dubai with the help of some important aides of General Pervez Musharraf.
The first conversation took place between Mohtarma Benazir Bhutto and General Ehtisham Zamir on our way back to London from Bradford in which it was offered by General Pervez Musharraf to release Asif Ali Zardari from jail to start the dialogue. She, however, declined that offer and informed Gen. Zamir in my presence that she would like to first release the PPP workers and other party leaders including Jahangir Badar, Yousaf Raza Gillani and others as confidence building measures to start any dialogue with him, as they are kept in jail due to political vendetta. This was the first NRO, which was declined by Mohtarma Benazir Bhutto and regretted the offer of release of Senator Asif Ali Zardari.
There was a gap in the dialogue for some time and some of the government operators were talking to Yousaf Raza Gillani who declined to leave the Pakistan People’s Party to join Musharraf. Similar offers were given to Makhdoom Amin Faheem who also declined it with thanks.The second round of the dialogue started in mid-2006, when a message was received from General Pervez Musharraf for a dialogue on transition of democracy. I had couple of meetings with the close aides of General Pervez Musharraf from army and his Principle Secretary level in Dubai on various dates. Both Mohtarma Benazir Bhutto and Mr. Asif Ali Zardari were kept informed about the developments.
A couple of meetings between me and close aides of General Pervez Musharraf resulted into a meeting between Mohtarma Benazir Bhutto and Gen. Pervez Musharraf in Abu Dhabi in early 2007 in a palace in the presence of some royal members and DG ISI Gen. Kiyani. This meeting was coordinated and facilitated by certain dignitaries of UAE.
Two Generals, myself, General Musharraf and Mohtarma Benazir Bhutto sat for the cup of tea and before saying goodbye, a few minutes before departure, General Musharraf asked Mohtarma Benazir Bhutto not to come Pakistan before 31st December 2007 and insisted to come after the General Elections and then we will celebrate the new year week together. She responded in negative and turned down the offer of General Pervez Musharraf by saying that “General Sahib it is not you who will decide my return date; it is my prerogative to decide as to when I would return and I have decided to return back on the 18th October, 2007”.
In the meantime, Mohtarma Benazir Bhutto went to the ladies room and General Musharraf addressed me saying that she listens you as a brother so please convince her not to come to Pakistan before general elections and I told General Musharraf that once she has decided her return date then it is not possible to change her decision, so please follow what she has told him. I told him that those who are supporting you and your uniform, one day you will look behind and there will be no one for you. But General Musharraf did not agree with me by stating that there would be lot of people who would stay behind him. The time is testimony that how he left.
It was the second offer by Gen. Musharraf to Mohtarma Benazir Bhutto, which was declined by her in the said meeting. The third attempt was made by General Musharraf when a senior General called me to come to Dubai from London, as he wanted to meet Mohtarma Benazir Bhutto with a special message of Gen. Musharraf. I accordingly flew from London to Dubai. Mohtarma Benazir Bhutto indicated a time for meeting and I along with the said General drove to her residence and on the way I came to know that he has offer for her from Gen. Musharraf for the closure of all cases in return of deferring the return of Mohtarma Benazir Bhutto to Pakistan before elections. The said meeting took place and resulted in a big no from her besides refusing the offer of closure of the cases. This was the third offer of NRO, which Mohtarma Benazir Bhutto had turned down.
Lately, Gen. Pervez Musharraf sent two of his trusted Generals along with Iqbal Z Khan who met Mohtarma Benazir Bhutto with yet another offer where Ms Naheed Khan and Mr. Safder Abbasi were also present. It was offered to Mohtarma Benazir Bhutto to accept the Chairmanship of Senate however Mohtarma Benazir Bhutto declined this 5th offer of NRO by Gen. Musharraf via his three trusted friends.

For the fourth time I received a call from President’s office informing that Ch. Shujaat Hussain along with Ch. Pervez Elahi and Senator Mushahid Hussain Syed have been tasked by General Musharraf to meet Mohtarma Benazir Bhutto with yet another offer and to convince her to defer his return to Pakistan before elections. I was flying from Dubai to London and I had taken my boarding card to fly but on the instructions of Mohtarma Benazir Bhutto I returned the boarding card and returned to her residence where we discussed the pros & cons of the meeting with three members of opponent party on behalf of Gen. Musharraf and finally Mohtarma Benazir Bhutto decided not to meet the visiting politicians. Hence I informed the Principle Secretary to Gen. Musharraf and in return I was informed that a special plane has been arranged for three of them to fly to Dubai and they were present at the airport. I however regretted that she has refused to meet them. It was the fourth time that the offer of an NRO was scrapped by Mohtarma Benazir Bhutto.
At another later date a telephonic conversation took place between Gen. Musharraf and Mohtarma Benazir Bhutto wherein she demanded of Gen. Pervez Musharraf to hold elections on time, to take off his uniform, to appoint a new Army Chief and successful transition of power to the next elected government. Gen. Musharraf however stated that Gen. Hamid would get in touch for some further proposals.
Few days later Mohtarma Benazir Bhutto and Asif Ali Zardari were present in a hotel in London and I was also there when I received a message from Gen. Hamid informing me that he is faxing a document like an agreement between Mohtarma Benazir Bhutto and Gen. Musharraf to take the mutual understanding forward. I went to the reception, collected the fax received from Gen. Hamid, presented it to her and as a result of discussion she decided to decline the said offer which was obviously not acceptable to her not to travel back to Pakistan before elections in return of the closure of cases against her. I accordingly informed Gen. Hamid and it was 6th time offer of the NRO, which was frustrated by Mohtarma Benazir Bhutto.
There was no written or verbal agreement between Mohtarma Benazir Bhutto and Gen. Pervez Musharraf, which could have been termed as NRO at later stage. However, there were persistent demands from Mohtarma Benazir Bhutto to Gen. Pervez Musharraf, as mentioned above. The same demands were followed later on when she arrived and it was me who conveyed to Gen. Musharraf and the guarantors of the dialogue that Gen. Musharraf had left with no choice except to take off his uniform. The persistent demands of Mohtarma Benazir Bhutto for the sake of restoration of democracy in the country had dismayed Gen. Musharraf. Besides, there were lot of under current issues within the government institutions but can be stated at some appropriate time.
In fact, Mohtarma Benazir Bhutto had declined the offer of Gen. Musharraf for 6th time, but Gen. Musharraf wanted to oblige MQM for the closure of the cases by using the shoulders of the PPP. Mr. M. Anwar spoke to me about this offer of NRO and I told him that we were out of it and never been in search of any NRO. What I learnt later was that the Law Minister Mr. Hamid drafted the NRO which in fact Ch. Shujaat and two other political leaders wanted to bring to Mohtarma Benazir Bhutto for her consent and having been declined several time Gen. Musharraf issued an NRO Ordinance proposed by the Ministry of Law duly approved by the Cabinet headed by Shaukat Aziz and it was implemented.
It may be kept in mind that none of the leadership of Pakistan People’s Party including Asif Ali Zardari were part of the Government and/or the Cabinet to have either influenced the government to issue National Reconciliation Ordinance (NRO). Hence PPP Leadership cannot be blamed for such NRO, which was, in fact, initiated by Gen. Musharraf on behalf of other party and not PPP.
If the investigation take place, the number of beneficiaries, cases closed, accused released from the jail will clear as to who were the actual beneficiary of NRO. It would be without any exaggeration to say that MQM had been the major beneficiary of the NRO of which thousands of cases were closed as a result of NRO and were never reopened after having NRO scrapped by the Supreme Court.
Once again I with full responsibility categorically stated that there was no NRO between PPP and Gen. Musharraf. The big achievements, which Mohtarma Benazir Bhutto achieved, were the dosing off the uniform by Gen. Musharraf, conducting of elections on time, appointment of new Army Chief and smooth transition of power. These were the achievement of Mohtarma Benazir Bhutto and she got those achieved without surrendering herself and without signing NRO.
Whatever I have written above, every word can be corroborated with evidence hence I appeal to all those who are blaming PPP for signing the NRO to not to distort historical facts out of personal disliking of the party.


  Note: The Article was published in "The Nation" dated October 28, 2018 and the link : NRO – Anti-PPP propaganda and reality: an eyewitness account by Senator A. Rehman Malik

Most Recent

Condolence Reference For Late Senator A. Rehman Malik Held At NPC

  ISLAMABAD     –    A condolence reference in memory of late Senator A Rehman Malik, former interior minister and senior leader of the Paki...